-------- Original Message --------
Subject: congressional hearing photo,1 december 2016
Subject: congressional hearing photo,1 december 2016
From: agrepublicanpress@mail.house.gov
To: lawrlcl@aol.com
Sent: 7/22/2015 12:32:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: Secretary Vilsack testifies before Agriculture Committee on agency oversight and accountability
![]()
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Haley Graves July 22, 2015 (202) 225-2171 Secretary Vilsack testifies before Agriculture Committee on agency oversight and accountability
Today, the House Agriculture Committee held a public hearing to conduct general oversight of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack testified, taking questions from committee members on various programs and projects the department manages and executes. Members referenced reports by USDA Inspector General Phyllis Fong (OIG) and the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).
"I appreciate Secretary Vilsack's time and cooperation today as the committee held its first oversight hearing since I became chairman. It is incumbent on our committee to conduct robust oversight and ensure that USDA is using taxpayer dollars in a responsible, efficient manner. I am greatly concerned by the IG's findings that reveal considerable failure in two important areas – namely IT management and the mismanagement of certain cooperative agreements and grants. Further, the Department has not implemented certain recommendations of the IG in these areas. The Department has failed to rectify these problems by recovering taxpayer dollars or holding those responsible accountable. I hope our increased efforts to highlight matters like these will encourage better stewardship of the Department's resources. Our nation's farmers, ranchers, and all taxpayers, deserve to know their hard-earned tax dollars are being used appropriately," said Chairman K. Michael Conaway, Chairman of the Agriculture Committee.
Written testimony provided by the witness from today's hearing is linked below. Click here for more information, including Chairman Conaway's opening statement, and the archived webcast.
Witness List:
Panel I
The Honorable Tom Vilsack, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
###
WEBSITE | UNSUBSCRIBE | CONTACT ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Click Here to view this email in your browser
Click Here to be removed from this list
this is as good as it can get in terms of proof as to how dysfunctional/abusive usda civil rights has been under the joe leonard leadership. we told secretary tom vilsack and the white house how bad things were and they ignored us for years.
the us supreme court is on notice as well.....Black farmer case.
Subject: The OSC Report Finding Wrongdoing by USDA-OASCR Is Now POSTED!!!
Hello All!
Please go to www.osc.gov. then click on: 1) Resources, 2) then click on: Public Files, 3) then click on FY 2015, 4) THEN GO TO USDA
Happy Reading!!!
Hello!
I've started the petition "Barack Obama: Stop the egregious hate crimes committed against the Independent Black Farmers and the USDA employees. Demand USDA to settle the cases of The IBF and employees on the merits of each case." and need your help to get it off the ground.
Will you take 30 seconds to sign it right now? Here's the link:
http://www.change.org/petitions/barack-obama-stop-the-egregious-hate-crimes-committed-against-the-independent-black-farmers-and-the-usda-employees-demand-usda-to-settle-the-cases-of-the-ibf-and-employees-on-the-merits-of-each-case
Here's why it's important:
This petition was started as a result of the US Dept. of Agriculture and the federal courts in all districts of the United States not following the laws when it comes to Black farmers. Americans should sign this petition because of the blatant egregious widespread discrimination at USDA Better known as "The Last Plantation." Black farmers need equal protection under the laws of the United States of America! Signing this petition can impact the lives of tens of thousands of Black farmers and their heirs across America. There are 14,000 plus cases of discrimination inside USDA unresolved, they need to be settled.
You can sign my petition by clicking here.
Thanks!
Ferrell C. Oden
How many people have to die before the agency gets serious about changing the culture of drugs, alcohol, sex, and violence as acceptable firefighter behaviors?
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
November 18, 2013 - 10:01 pm EST
CAMPTONVILLE, California — A forest firefighter lying in a road was run over and killed by a colleague in a sparely populated stretch of Northern California in a bizarre early morning traffic incident involving alcohol, authorities said Monday.
California Highway Patrol investigators said a driver in Yuba County early Saturday spotted a man, Michael Patrick Kelly, 32, lying in the road about 3 miles from Camptonville, California, which is about 80 miles north of Sacramento.
The unidentified driver flashed his high beams in a failed attempt to warn an approaching vehicle that it was on a collision course with the man in the road.
The small car with six passengers, driven by Andrew Gruenberg, 26, struck Kelly, who was pronounced dead at the scene with head and torso injuries, the CHP said.
After hitting Kelly, Gruenberg traveled another 2 miles to his destination, telling investigators later that he believed he ran over an animal. A passenger called 911 and reported the collision and a "hazard in the roadway."
After arriving at his destination, two of Kelly's passengers got into another car and drove back to the accident site, where they encountered emergency crews.
"Alcohol appears to be a factor in the collision," CHP officer Greg Tassone. Tassone declined to release any further details, saying the investigation is still active. He did not say who authorities think was drinking.
The U.S. Forest Service said Kelly was a full-time employee and squad boss for the Tahoe Hotshots Crew, which is based in Camptonville.
Gruenberg is a member of the same crew.
--
Lesa L. Donnelly
We have lost our sense of shame. — Colin Powell
From: thea@ruralco.org
To: lawrlcl@aol.com
Sent: 4/24/2013 6:15:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: URGENT: Claims Process Deadline - ONLY A FEW DAYS REMAIN
Hi, just a reminder that you're receiving this email because you have expressed an interest in Rural Coalition. Don't forget to add bryn@ruralco.org to your address book so we'll be sure to land in your inbox!
You may unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our emails.![]()
![]()
ACTION ALERT: FINAL DEADLINE APPROACHING FOR HISPANIC & WOMEN FARMERS AND RANCHERS
CLAIMS PROCESS - ONLY A FEW DAYS REMAIN!!
The USDA process to resolve the claims of Hispanic and Women farmers and ranchers who assert that they were discriminated against when seeking USDA farm loans has been extended, and will now close May 1, 2013. As such, only days remain to preserve your right to file a claim.The two-tier claims process will provide at least $1.33 billion in compensation, plus up to $160 million in farm debt relief, to eligible women and Hispanic farmers and ranchers. USDA opened the 180-day claims period September 25, 2012. The claims period now closes May 1, 2013.If you believe the USDA improperly denied farm loan program benefits to you between 1981 and 1996 or between mid-October 1998 and mid-October 2000 because you are Hispanic or female, you may be eligible to apply for compensation by filing a claim. This means you may be eligible if:
- You sought a farm loan or farm loan servicing during the period 1981 through 1996 or mid-October 1998 through mid-October 2000;
- The loan or loan servicing was denied, approved for a lesser amount than requested, approved with restrictive conditions, or provided late; USDA failed to provide appropriate loan servicing; or USDA actively discouraged you from applying for the loan or loan servicing; and
- You believe these actions were based on your being Hispanic or female.
There are only a few days remaining for claimants to file their claims form. Please read information below on filing the form on time given the short time remaining.It is critical to submit claims forms, on/or before midnight, on May 1, 2013. Any claims filed after midnight, May 1, 2013, will be denied. Please read and pass along the following requirements for claims:If you think you might be eligible for this claims process:1. You should also work immediately to prepare your complete claim for filing. To do so, first contact the Claims Administrator (EPIQ) at 1-888-508-4429 or www.farmerclaims.gov as soon as possible to request that your individually numbered claims form be sent to you. Your completed form must be POSTMARKED no later than May 1, 2013. We strongly suggest you get a receipt from the post office.Mail your information to:USDA Hispanic & Women Farmers and RanchersClaims AdministratorP. O. Box 4540Portland, OR 97208-45402. We also strongly suggest you immediately seek assistance from an attorney or an advocate to move forward on preparing a complete form with all necessary documentation. The process of filing a claim is complex, and assistance from a lawyer or an advocate experienced in the process is strongly advised. In order to seek an attorney to help prepare your claim, please click the following "live" link to find an attorney in your area: Legal Assistance List. (This link updates as new attorneys register & receive training on the claims process).3. Claimants who file claims, on/or before midnight, May 1, 2013, but whose claims are incomplete WILL most likely be considered. We understand that claimants who submit incomplete claims will receive a letter from the Claims Administrator, EPIQ Systems, indicating what information is missing from their claim. Claimants will have the opportunity to file a completed claims form, within the time indicated, in your letter from EPIQ. These claimants will have the opportunity after the Claims Deadline to submit the missing information. Therefore, if you have just learned about the process, complete as much of the form as you are able and mail with a letter explaining you just learned of the process and will submit missing information as soon as you are able.Rural Coalition also has a list of advocates who are available to assist claimants. Please request this list by sending an email to HWFRClaims@ruralco.org.Questions and concerns may be addressed to Rural Coalition and staff at: HWFRClaims@ruralco.orgAdditional information is available from USDA Office of Advocacy & Outreach follow this link to their website: http://www.outreach.usda.gov/
This alert is sent out by:
Rural Coalition1029 Vermont Ave Suite 601
Washington, DC 20005
Please send any questions or feedback to
![]()
![]()
This email was sent to lawrlcl@aol.com by thea@ruralco.org |Rural Coalition | 1029 Vermont Avenue NW | Suite 601 | Washington | DC | 20005
New film looks at 'War on Whistleblowers'
By Joe Davidson, Published: April 23
The Obama administration's approach to federal whistleblowers has been likened to "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde."
On the good doctor's side, President Obama has important accomplishments in protecting the rights of whistleblowers. Yet whistleblower advocates are fuming at the administration's actions against federal employees whom it considers to be leakers of national security information.
"There's a schizophrenia within the administration," said Tom Devine, legal director of the nonprofit Government Accountability Project. "It's been Obama versus Obama on whistleblower policy. Until recently, there was a virtual free-speech advocacy for whistleblower job rights that's unprecedented, more than any other president in history.
"At the same time," Devine added, "he has willingly allowed the Justice Department to prosecute whistleblowers on tenuous grounds."
That last point — the Mr. Hyde side — is the focus of the new film "War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State." (Disclosure: The documentary features comments by Dana Priest, a Washington Post colleague.) It is a project of the Brave New Foundation, a social justice advocacy organization. The film is being shown in theaters in New York City and Los Angeles, but the main distribution channels will be iTunes, Netflix, Hulu, Amazon and cable systems.
The Justice Department rejects the notion that it is overzealous in its prosecution of those the government calls national security leakers.
"Unauthorized disclosures of classified information cause damage to our national security and we take the investigation and prosecution of such matters very seriously," Dean Boyd, a Justice Department spokesman, said via e-mail. "In these and all other cases, Justice Department investigators and prosecutors follow the facts and the law to determine whether charges are appropriate."
The Justice Department does not target whistleblowers, he added: "However, we cannot condone the knowing and willful disclosure of classified information to the media or others not entitled to such information. An individual in authorized possession of classified information has no authority or right to unilaterally determine that it should be made public or otherwise disclose it."
The film recognizes the president's good side, with a quick nod by Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight. The "good news," she said, is passage of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act, which Obama supported, and his directive providing protection for national security whistleblowers. That mention, however, is not until 59 minutes into the 66-minute film.
Balanced? No. But the stories about the government's aggressive moves against federal employees who worked to uphold the finest traditions of public service are chilling and deserve the notice and outrage the film hopes to generate.
Franz Gayl's is the first case presented. The Defense Department civilian employee was punished for his efforts to save the lives of U.S. troops at war.
"Hundreds of Marines were tragically lost and probably thousands maimed unnecessarily, so I said, let's replace the Humvees with what are called MRAPs, Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles," he says in the film.
After taking his concerns to Pentagon officials with no luck, he went to the news media. Then the blowback hit. He was stripped of his security clearance, the lifeline for national security workers, and suspended.
"They were using all these personnel actions against me," he said. "I'm the substandard employee, bottom 3 percent, unreliable, untrustworthy, et cetera, et cetera. After investigations and after all these personnel actions and reprisals, I was placed on administrative leave.
"I was fearful. If I have to leave the government now and I don't have security clearances, we're gonna have to move away. I can't get a job around here. You can't do anything without a security clearance around [the] D.C. area. I knew that life was gonna go 'foof,' fall off a cliff."
Gayl was fortunate to have whistleblower advocates who cushioned his fall. And in November 2011, after intervention by an Office of Special Counsel that was re-energized by Obama, the military's threat to suspend Gayl indefinitely was lifted and his security clearance was reinstated.
There's a lot left out of his story in this space, and similar stories of other whistleblowers can't be mentioned at all. Gayl's is a distressing tale of Uncle Sam playing the bully, making life hell for a federal employee who fought to better protect American troops.
"I'm now working back at the Pentagon in the office from which I was removed," Gayl says at the end of the film. "I feel very lucky, because I received a lot of support from a lot of outsiders that I don't think every person in my situation gets."
The film makes you wonder how many more trampled, and largely unknown, federal whistleblowers like Gayl are out there.
Twitter: @JoeDavidsonWP Previous columns by Joe Davidson are available at wapo.st/JoeDavidson.© The Washington Post Company
--
Thanks!Linda Epstein
USDA Coalition of Minority Employees and Alabama NAACP "Stand for Justice" with Independent Black Farmers against USDA Discrimination and CorruptionPress ConferenceTuesday, March 19th 2013 at 10:00amKelly Ingram Park, Birmingham, AL 35203Out-of-State Reporters can join by phone at 866-508-2264 Passcode: 2127510