order non hybrid seeds LandRightsNFarming: fraudulent conveyance
Showing posts with label fraudulent conveyance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fraudulent conveyance. Show all posts

Monday, October 22, 2012

FW: Hispanic and Women Farmers and Ranchers Claims Filing Period Now Open

From: usdafsa@service.govdelivery.com
To: tillery@aol.com
Sent: 9/24/2012 6:31:28 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: Hispanic and Women Farmers and Ranchers Claims Filing Period Now Open
 

September 24, 2012

http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTIwOTI0LjEwNzI3NjcxJm1lc3NhZ2VpZD1NREItUFJELUJVTC0yMDEyMDkyNC4xMDcyNzY3MSZkYXRhYmFzZWlkPTEwMDEmc2VyaWFsPTE2OTU1Njc0JmVtYWlsaWQ9dGlsbGVyeUBhb2wuY29tJnVzZXJpZD10aWxsZXJ5QGFvbC5jb20mZmw9JmV4dHJhPU11bHRpdmFyaWF0ZUlkPSYmJg==&&&100&&&http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=landing&topic=landing
Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

USDA Announces Hispanic and Women Farmer and Rancher Claims Period Now Open


Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today announced that Hispanic and women farmers and ranchers who allege discrimination by the USDA in past decades can file claims between September 24, 2012 and March 25, 2013.
 
The process offers a voluntary alternative to litigation for each Hispanic or female farmer and rancher who can prove that USDA denied their applications for loan or loan servicing assistance for discriminatory reasons for certain time periods between 1981 and 2000.

As announced in February 2011, the voluntary claims process will make available at least $1.33 billion for cash awards and tax relief payments, plus up to $160 million in farm debt relief, to eligible Hispanic and women farmers and ranchers. There are no filing fees to participate in the program.

The Department will continue reaching out to potential Hispanic and female claimants, around the country to get the word out to individuals who may be eligible for this program so they have the opportunity to participate.

Call center representatives can be reached at 1-888-508-4429. Claimants must register for a claims package (by calling the number or visiting the website) and the claims package will be mailed to claimants. All those interested in learning more or receiving information about the claims process and claims packages are encouraged to attend meetings in your communities about the claims process and contact the website or claims telephone number.

Phone: 1-888-508-4429
Claims Period: September 24, 2012 - March 25, 2013.

Independent legal services companies will administer the claims process and adjudicate the claims. Although there are no filing fees to participate and a lawyer is not required to participate in the claims process, persons seeking legal advice may contact a lawyer or other legal services provider.
To read Secretary Tom Vilsack's entire news release issued today (9/24/12) click on the following link:

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Stop 9410, Washington, DC 20250-9450, or call toll-free at (866) 632-9992 (English) or (800) 877-8339 (TDD) or (866) 377-8642 (English Federal-relay) or (800) 845-6136 (Spanish Federal-relay).
This email was sent to tillery@aol.com using GovDelivery, on behalf of: USDA Farm Service Agency · 1400 Independence Ave., S.W. · Washington, DC 20250 · 800-439-1420 http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTIwOTI0LjEwNzI3NjcxJm1lc3NhZ2VpZD1NREItUFJELUJVTC0yMDEyMDkyNC4xMDcyNzY3MSZkYXRhYmFzZWlkPTEwMDEmc2VyaWFsPTE2OTU1Njc0JmVtYWlsaWQ9dGlsbGVyeUBhb2wuY29tJnVzZXJpZD10aWxsZXJ5QGFvbC5jb20mZmw9JmV4dHJhPU11bHRpdmFyaWF0ZUlkPSYmJg==&&&115&&&http://www.govdelivery.com/portals/powered-by

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Global warming scam Green Helmets and Jackboots

Global warming scam Green Helmets and Jackboots

This is the same techniques used against farmers from approximately 26 or 27 Sates in America. Including the prevention of some from building and producing and marketing their own energy, and the lands of the family farmers no matter wether they were Black ,White,Red,or Hispanic, nor wether they were Male or Female, or Disabled, if a USGS report and some if not most were from1907 showing that these Farms were sitting on Oil,Coal,Certain types of Shale, other valuable minerals, has been the USDA and all of the Agencies, Administrations,Associations, Legacy Players to use force against otherwise peaceful people who have inherent rights of passage to the use of the land.
We now Stand Together in America To Demand: Total compliance of the Rules and Regulations as is Administratively set forth, in such Documents as would hold the Rules and Regulations that are required to be honored.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

FW: JPMorgan Fighting 10,000 Lawsuits: FILE! FILE! FILE!


Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:29:30 -0800
From: cornmash008@yahoo.com
Subject: Fw: JPMorgan Fighting 10,000 Lawsuits: FILE! FILE! FILE!
To: terri4truth@gmail.com; rudithomas1011@yahoo.com; drterrylyn@yahoo.com; tonykeyhorses@yahoo.com; restore_it_now@yahoo.com; eddie_messer@yahoo.com; bornedaneagle@yahoo.com; abonnie@pacbell.net; Soldiersaint@sbcglobal.net; poolworld90@yahoo.com; henjowil@gmail.com; jimstrees@yahoo.com; angusfarms@hotmail.com; addinquir@aol.com; meredith2729@yahoo.com; mompookie@hotmail.com



--- On Tue, 3/1/11, Private Attorney General <justice0927@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

From: Private Attorney General <justice0927@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: JPMorgan Fighting 10,000 Lawsuits: FILE! FILE! FILE!
To: "Private Attorney General" <justice0927@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2011, 7:54 PM

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- JPMorgan Chase (JPM_) is a defendant in more than 10,000 legal proceedings and may be $4.5 billion short of reserves needed to cover those costs in a worst-case scenario, the firm said in a regulatory filing on Monday.
 
The New York-based bank's legal woes range from individual actions against JPMorgan Chase to class actions with "potentially millions" of litigants to "regulatory/government investigations." The suits include common law tort and contract claims, statutory antitrust claims, securities claims and consumer protection claims, the bank said in its 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
JPMorgan is the last of the four big U.S. banks to detail some of its exposure to litigation in its annual report. While the banks didn't say what their overall litigation reserves are, JPMorgan, Citigroup (C_), Bank of America (BAC_) and Wells Fargo (WFC_) outlined a potential $11.2 billion shortfall in litigation reserves altogether.
Last week, Citi said it might fall $4 billion short, while BofA said it might be $1.5 billion behind legal cost reserves and Wells Fargo said it might be $1.2 billion behind.
Banks' legal woes have gotten much attention ever since the so-called "robosigning" scandal erupted last fall. Banks made a practice of letting employees sign off on thousands of foreclosure affidavits without properly vetting the underlying information. In some cases, homes were seized and in others there is doubt over who rightly owns the property - both in terms of mortgage-bond investors and in terms of occupants.
Regulators and all 50 state attorneys general have been investigating big banks' mortgage practices. Federal agencies are trying to pull together a plan to settle with big mortgage servicers in a deal that may result in billions of dollars' worth of principal forgiveness for troubled borrowers. The result of private litigation is more difficult to predict.
In a conference call last month, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon predicted that securitization lawsuits alone will be a long, difficult battle.
"It is going to be years before this plays out and this litigation is going to be fought almost securitization by securitization," Dimon said. "There is almost no other way to do it."

CW
Private Attorney General
http://privateattorneygeneral.spruz.com

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

FW: Letter to editor: or guest column "Open Letter to Congress"


Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:00:46 -0800
From: davis4000_2000@yahoo.com
Subject: Letter to editor: or guest column "Open Letter to Congress"
To: muckracker1@gmail.com

 

Open letter to Congress--It's time for weed cleaning in USDA
By Monica Davis
In response to US Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack's 2009 letter claiming
that it was a "new era at USDA", and before he shoved his boot in his mouth with
the premature firing of Shirley Sherrord over a highly edited clip showing her
"racist ways," Lesa Donnelly, a former USDA Forest Service fire fighter who is
now an activist/mediator, wrote:
I am experiencing déjà vu from your 14 action items. While they sound like a
good start, excuse me if I am somewhat skeptical of your plan to bring in a new
era of civil rights at USDA - I've heard it before. And while past "new
approaches" took years to implement, employees continued to lose their
financial, emotional and physical well-being from harassment and retaliation.
The number one reason for this is that many of the employees you will task to
implement your action items are the same employees who worked under Espy,
Glickman, and so on. They were obstacles to positive change in civil rights then
and they will be obstacles to change now. I would like to take this opportunity
to recommend that you pay close attention to the current employees in your OGC
and inspector general offices, civil rights office, human resources office,
mediation cadre, and your directors and regional foresters because these
employees have been the biggest obstacle to making positive changes in civil
rights. I would like to suggest that you seriously reconsider contracting with
attorneys to represent the agency. I've observed they have little vested
interest in settling EEO cases and much interest in receiving thousands of
taxpayer dollars as they extend cases to oblivion. Action item one should be -
Weed Out Obstructionists.
Donnelly, a current Vice-President of the Coalition of Minority Employees, noted
massive problems with USDA and the Forest Service (FS), where substantial
bigotry remains in the "Last Plantation" after more than three decades of
litigation and congressional hearings and legislation.
·         In 2007, a woman in Region 4 was brutally assaulted by a male
coworker. The coworker was not held properly accountable. The woman believes she
is at risk for additional violence. FS management has been nonresponsive and she
has been retaliated against in 2008 and 2009 for filing a complaint.

·         In 2008, an African American woman in Region 5 was threatened and
intimidated by her white male supervisor who told another man that he wanted to
shoot her with his gun. There was no accountability and the woman, who had been
complaining about harassment from this man for years was retaliated against for
reporting the incident.
·         In 2009, there are continual Region 5 incidents of female employees
and employees of color being discriminated against in hiring, promotion and
assignments. This is occurring despite 30 years of litigation for gender and
race discrimination.
·         Women in law enforcement and firefighting are harassed and
discriminated against throughout the Forest Service, particularly in Regions 4,
5 and 6.
·         In 2008, a Region 6 female firefighter (Helicopter Rappel Manager) was
terminated as a result of whistle blowing on her crew for drinking on the job
and other unsafe practices. Former Under Secretary Mark Rey personally assured
me an OIG investigation was initiated but key witnesses have yet to be
interviewed. As we move into fire season I am concerned that personnel and the
public are still at risk.
·         A former female employee in Region 10 (Alaska) who has a serious
disability and physical deformity was harassed, isolated and shunned by her male
supervisor and coworkers. They would make fun of her, humiliate her and treat
her as if she was mentally incompetent due to her physical disability. She quit
due to emotional stress.
·         Recently two African American employees in APHIS were publicly
humiliated when they were presented with monkey dolls as awards.  (Donnelly
letter)


Donnelly is right: USDA is in need of a major weed cleaning. If Congress does
not clean out the obstructionist weeds in the agency, they will strangle and
impede this Settlement, just like they strangled the last one, and other civil
rights class actions over the last 15 years.


It will be business as usual. USDA has made sure of that, beginning with its
failure to make it its mission to add a statement of future compliance and
efforts to ensure compliance with civil rights laws and federal statutes:

Judge Friedman also declared that he was "surprised and disappoint[ed]" that the
USDA did not want to include in the consent decree a sentence that in the future
the USDA would exert "best efforts to ensure compliance with all applicable
statutes and regulations prohibiting discrimination."(CRS report for Congress,
The Pigford Case: USDA Settlement of a Discrimination Suit by Black Farmers,
2010)

In fact, it has been business as usual for the past 14 years, from the filing of
the Donnely female firefighter class action in 1995 against the US Forest
Service (USDA), to the first Black Farmer Lawsuit in 1997, to  the current 2008
Pigford II case.

Lawrence Lucas, Coalition President said, "The blatant discrimination in USDA
and especially the Forest Service is allowing wide-spread abuse of women and
others in California.  We thought the Donnelly Settlement would have a positive
impact but the Forest Service refuses to implement it and USDA refuses to hold
managers accountable.

The 14 year of litigation--Pigford and the current Black Farmer Agreement shows
that it will take more than mere funding of a settlement to eliminate the
institutional bigotry and criminal collusion which necessitated the Black Farmer
Settlement, and other class action suits for women farmers, Native American
Farmers and disadvantaged white farmers in the first place.


Litigation against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for discrimination
against African- American farmers began in August 1997 with two discrimination
suits brought by black farmers—Pigford v. Glickman, No. 97-1978 (D.D.C. 1997)
and Brewington v. Glickman, No. 98-1693 (D.D.C. 1997)—but its origins go back
much further.1 For many years, black farmers had complained that they were not
receiving fair treatment when they applied to local county committees (which
make the decisions) for farm loans or assistance. These farmers alleged that
they were being denied USDA farm loans or forced to wait longer for loan
approval than were non-minority farmers. Many black farmers contended that they
were facing foreclosureand financial ruin because the USDA denied them timely
loans and debt restructuring. Moreover, many claimed that the USDA was not
responsive to discrimination complaints. A huge agency backlog of unresolved
complaints began to build after the USDA's Civil Rights Office was closed in
1983. (CRS report for Congress, The Pigford Case: USDA Settlement of a
Discrimination Suit by Black Farmers, 2010)

Moreover, researchers note that the latest Black Farmer Settlement, "Pigford II"
is "terminal" in the sense that it can not be appealed:

The Pigford II settlement is final and may not be appealed. A provision of the
settlement permitted the claimants to void the settlement should Congress not
make the $1.15 billion appropriation by March 31, 2010. While Congress did not
make this deadline, the settlement is clearly a priority of both the USDA and
the White House, suggesting that the plaintiffs are unlikely to exercise the
right to void the settlement in the near term. Unlike the original Pigford
decision, the Pigford II settlement does not include a suggested settlement
amount for individual claimants, although it does provide for higher payments to
claimants who go through a more rigorous review process. Claimants can seek
fast-track payments of up to $50,000 plus debt relief, or choose a longer
process for damages of up to $250,000. Payments to successful claimants could
begin in the middle of 2011 if the funds are appropriated. (CRS report for
Congress, The Pigford Case: USDA Settlement of a Discrimination Suit by Black
Farmers, 2010)
The "late filers" who missed out on Pigford I have the opportunity to fast-track
their claims and receive up to $50,000 and debt relief, or they can choose a
more rigorous process which is longer, and could result in damages of up to
$250,000.  Either way, it is a bittersweet pill for farmers who have lost farm,
property and income worth millions.
When the average tractor costs more than $50,000 and land goes for as much as
$2500/acre, or more, many of these farmers have lost years of income, and
property worth as much as $500,000, or more.  The  black farmer whose land
contains more than $100,000,000 in coal and oil reserves, the cotton farmer who
produced more than $250,000 in cotton annually, or the would be chicken farmer
who was driven out of business, looks with bitterness at the $250,000 ceiling,
but half a loaf is better than none.
While half a loaf is better than none, many of these farmers would like to see
these institutional thieves, abusers and rapists jailed and prosecuted.  That
will only happen if Congress grows a spine and cleans the weeds out of USDA.
Civil rights laws, federal law and the Constitution apply to USDA, and
everywhere else.
Many farmers are saying thanks, but they'd like to see some house cleaning
at USDA.
Monica Davis is an author/editor/activist who has written and reported for
print, Internet and radio outlets for  more than a decade.  Her book, Land,
Legacy, and Lynching: Building the Future for Black America profiles the
atrocity of economic terrorism in the nation's cities and in farm country.



Monday, December 6, 2010

Does Rothschilds and Monsanto Really Own the US Senate?

Fraudulent Foreclosures,Poisoned Water,S510,The death of innocent men and women in uniforms from around the world,unsafe  food....Senator Harry Reed are you hearing this, Monsanto,DuPont,Rothschild,Vatican, Illuminati, Do they own you, How about you Senator Richard Luger, Do They Own You ?

I never wanted to be in the lime light, I did however determine, no one will run over me, nor anyone that I
could help.

I rescind any and all signatures in commerce  of the following  Melissa Ann Seaver, Melissa Seaver and any derivative there of. And Am not responsible for debt other than my own. Hear that you defrauders!

I Demand all of the  Freedom of Information Act Requests, that have gone unanswered to be immediately, delivered in full and with out any further delay or collections of money, including USDA,FmHA,FSA,ASCS and all other related agency's. and Courts. : c/o 150 Keith Street, Scottsburg, Inidana [47170]
This must include all documents...un redacted, including Court Documents as to the fraudulent foreclosure of the Seaver Family Farm in Scottsburg, Indiana.And any relative numbers, including the CUSIP No.
The destruction of the Native American Mound site 12S74 that was nominated for Preservation instead Rick Jones, took it over to Archaeology and Ann Bader, of the Corn Island Archaeology&amp; Falls of the Ohio Archaeology.

This also includes the Office of Civil Rights in  WASHINGTON,DC who blatantly ignored the farmer complaints and the Office of Inspector General who helped with the Frauds by hiding pertinent information in their reports. see OIG reports to the Secretary of Agriculture.

Officer's of the Court, Standing Trustee Joseph M Black Jr.,Assistant U.S.Attorney Jeffery Hunter,Farm Service Agency's Douglas Kirby, and another Unidentified man harassed a disabled man, into a second heart attack at a Bankruptcy hearing. At the Southern District of Indiana' US Bankruptcy Court New Albany Division.

US Attorney's who acted like immature children, instead of the educated and supposed civilized cream of the crop they are portrayed to be, including....former Indiana U S Attorney Susan Brooks,&amp; Timothy Morrison Marsha Massey, Debra G. Richards, Jeffery Hunter, among others.

Let's not be unfair to the Judges   Judge Sarah Evans Barker, refused to allow a hearing on a foreclosure! There never was one   (Look here FBI, could this be the next link in the Operation Grey Lord, same7th Circuit)    Then the Magistrates, the one who rubber stamped the foreclosure, that he saw documents that he never saw, making any such Foreclosure of the Seaver Farm at RR4 Box 69, a/k/a 2077 North Terry Rd,
Scottsburg, Indiana [47170]    NULL AND VOID, VOID JUDGMENTS AND VOID ORDERS.

Meaning This property hast to be returned to the rightful owners  : The Mayme [Seaver] &amp; Jerry &amp; Melissa [Seaver]

Let's also not forget the County Government, including the Area Planning Committee, Do you realize you are
paying for them to plan ,the stealing of your property, your Children and Grand Children's inheritance.

Your County Commissioners are also responsible for this and anyone having such evidence should be ready
to turn this into the appropriate authorizes.
County, Assessors, Auditors, and Most Especially County Treasurer's , and Recorder's for the changing of records and the going along with  the guys who told you it would be ok, and How did the County Treasurer's
 Indiana get off Scott Free after being Audited by the State Board of Accounts and having Special Prosecutors called in. (  Is that why they were called Special Prosecutors!)  If you or I were to fraud the system, we would be jailed .

.In Scott County Indiana, when this happened with the Scott County Treasurer, just enough time
lapsed that she got off , because the same papers and the same law firm  "Houston and Thompson" each
 representing and entity involved  Mr. Houston Representing (The County/ The County Treasurer) &amp; Mr.
Thompson representing the (Austin Rural Economic Community or AREC) The AREC just so happened to loose the same amount of money for the same exact dates as reported by Marti Randal of the Scott County Journal and also by the Louisville Courier Journal as well as several others, then Jurisdiction of investigation was argued over who had the authority the Indiana State Police or the FBI, the ISP must have won out but this brings up another controversy as the ISP officer involved Sargent Jerry Goodin's Father was on the Board of Directors of the AREC program, and the AREC program also was Set up by John C Thompson as President Clinton appointee, to the Rural Development after loosing is appointment to the Presidential Appointed Executive Director of the Farm Service Agency, following the results of the OIG investigation order by then Secretary of Agriculture Mike Espy.                      

Many acts of Malfeasance, Fraudulent conveyance,collusion between agency's and levels and branches of government, Child Abuse, Animal Abuse, Cattle Rustling, Endangering the safety of the community,Legacy
of Nepotism, theory of Reverse Nepotism, Theft, Theft By Deception,Trafficking in Counterfeit Securities,
Unlawful Mortgagee(s),Endangering the life of a child,Violation of the American with Disabilities Act,Unlawful Entry,Destruction of Personal Property.Theft of Personal Property,Theft of Property(land)(machinery),
Theft &amp; Destruction of U.S.Mail, Invasion Of Privacy, Breaking and Entering, Criminal Trespass, Theft of and Destruction of Lawful Records,Harassment,Stalking,Spying,Destruction of Wildlife Habitat, Arborcide,
theft of Intellectual Properties,Forgery, and many others items to numerous to list here.
Have been perpetrated against the Seaver Family.

They now steal the stimulus payments of a disabled man, for administrative offset, for forged loans the Seaver Family does not owe.

There is many aspects of this situation that have been brought to light and still unanswered, and many new facets, including taxes, damages, physical and punitive.

This may be considered a Notice of Intent To Sue and the hard copy is on it's way!

                                                                    by: Melissa Seaver