Seaver Family "We would appreciate any and all prayers. Thank you!! The Seavers"

Some of You may be aware that Jerry Seaver was taken to the ER via ambulance Christmas Day....
I am requesting any and all of my contacts ask the Creator in a prayerful mode to ask for healing on my beloved husband and my children and grandchildren and Jerry's mother Mayme and my father Bill
As you know he is all of have except our descendants, sibs, and parent(s)
I dont know about all of this political correctness, but I am asking if you believe in prayer and miracles then help my family as we pray for our loved one and a miracle...

Thank You
Sincerely
Melissa Seaver

---

Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:18:03 -0800
To: angusfarms@hotmail.com
From: notification+kjdmh13d-_ji@facebookmail.com
Subject: Monica Bowers added a new photo: "We would appreciate any and all prayers. Thank you!! The Seavers"

facebook Monica Bowers Monica Bowers added a new photo: "We would appreciate any and all prayers. Thank you!! The Seavers" Like · Comment · Share You are receiving this email because you've listed Monica Bowers as a close friend. Change Close Friend Notifications. View Post This message was sent to angusfarms@hotmail.com. If you don't want to receive these emails from Facebook in the future, please unsubscribe. Facebook, Inc., Attention: Department 415, PO Box 10005, Palo Alto, CA 94303

USDA Undr the Obama/Vilsack administration Promises

Since Mr Lincoln started the program through the Re-Construction Act following the Civil War, what today is known as the United States Department of Agriculture or USDA as it is commonly many Presidential Administrations have made Promises, they also have Rules and Regulations, and the Obama and Vilsack Administration are Non-Compliant with-in those Rules and Regulations and also in the Promises made to Constituents who voted for Change.



The only changes have not been the Promises of the Campaign Trail, as in "History Repeating It's Self"
In 1972 the USDA's Young Executives Plan To Liquidate The American Farmer was put into Place by the very People who were making Promises to the Farmer's.

In the 1970's there were massive amounts of Farms, Farmers, and rural Families lost to the machine.
In the 1980's again massive numbers were being lost "Farmer Claims/ NESARA were being hid" a new wave of forcing one generation from the land by deliberately Defrauding two or more generations of the same farm family.
In the 1990's many farmers were continually being hurt, so much so that usda employees were targeted if they tried to help, the farmers.
In the 2000- the same is still happening and as we speak new farm families are being drawn in like lambs to the slaughter.
The Securitization's of these farm loans were unlawful, they were in them selves the defrauding of the farmers.
Some of the farmer's and the USDA employees were dealt low blows by the Department of Justice because, and office of Civil Rights, in the multifaceted and underhanded dealings for Bonuses for Foreclosure's with
violating both employees and farmer right's to Due Process, violating Constitutional Right's of Land,Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

the same as with the bundling of the Home Mortgages and selling off to foreign entities the USDA in 1997
multi-bundled and securitized farmer loans and sold them off as securities.

Some farmers who have been fighting the USDA machine for years, Mayme & Jerry and Melissa Seaver of Indiana, George and Karen Reitz of Kansas, George Hildebrand of Kansas, Darwin and Diane Rice of Iowa, the late Harry T Young of Kentucky, the late Vellus Redden, of Arkansas, Marie and Larry Mack Joint Venture of Texas, and many others.

Some minority employees of the USDA have been sexually assaulted,sexually harassed, discriminated do to race,color,creed,gender,nationality, that have been physically abused, threatened, some just because, and others for having the intestinal fortitude to stand up for
or do the right thing, just plain old doing the job they were hired to do without becoming greedy.

BANK OF AMERICA TRYING TO COLLECT MONEY FROM ELDERLY WOMAN THEY FORECLOSED ON WHO FILED BANKRUPTCY !

Bank of America foreclosed on elderly woman[whose name will be left omitted] from Southern Indiana.
Her husband passed away , she had asked for helping re-amortizing her loan, at [BOA's refusal] she sought protection by filing a chapter 7 Bankruptcy"and" turning over her home, that had been in her husbands family for many years.

Being "Discharged" and being assured [she was now homeless] she was debt free, she has now received a letter from BOA stating they bought insurance amounting to over $3000.00 on the home no longer in her possession, and turned over in the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, and stating they were taking this Insurance at her expense. Receiving this letter right at Christmas time.

The audacity, of these criminals in ties, causing so much stress and hardship on people in general, but on helpless elderly widows is unthinkable, adding insult to injury but to harass and unlawfully contact her after she was given discharge in a Bankruptcy, they ruined her Christmas as well.

This sweet old woman has had to deal with ragging high blood pressure and sugar readings since all of this
has happened to her.

Will Congress keep fighting over unimportant matters or protect innocent people from the predators! 
by: Melissa Seaver
 Scottsburg, Indiana
landrightsnfarming.seamom89@gmail.com
(812)752-6611

Re: FINAL-- Looks Good

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:18 AM, <LawrLCL@aol.com> wrote:

---

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:                     TUESDAY, 27 SEPTEMBER 2011

CONTACT PERSONS:

LAWRENCE LUCAS, 856/ 910-2399

LESA DONNELLY, 530/ 365-3456

MICHAEL STOVALL, 256/ 690-1752

"FILIBUSTER FOR JUSTICE"

USDA COALITION OF MINORITY EMPLOYEES & MINORITY FARMERS

On Tuesday, October 4, 2011, a group of peaceful law abiding American citizens, consisting of present and former U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) employees, minority farmers and advocates, will gather to "Filibuster for Justice". The event will take place in front of USDA: "The Last Plantation", between 12th & 14th Streets SW, Jefferson Drive (on the mall side), and Washington DC. The kick-off will begin at 12:00 noon.

The daily demonstration is being conducted because the now Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, who was appointed by President Obama, has for more than two years refused to meet with the group to discuss their more than twenty-five "civil rights issues and concerns." The USDA Coalition of Minority Employees (The Coalition) and minority farmers are requesting Secretary Vilsack to immediately meet and properly address the decade long racism, sexism, sexual assaults, bullying, racial epithet (hangman's nooses, use of the "N" word, the justifying of a monkey doll award to Black employees), reprisals, intimidation, hostile work environment, and other widespread abuses against USDA employees and minority farmers.

The group will ask President Obama to promptly intervene and bring this long history of widespread discrimination to an end and not continue to "put a bandage on a cancer". We want USDA top officials held "accountable", and the USDA Office of Civil Rights....administration and process, put in "receivership."

The filibuster will also petition Congressional Oversight Committees and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, to exercise their fiduciary and other responsibilities to end abuses at USDA. President after president, congress after congress, republicans and democrats, have far too long silently observed USDA's behavior from a distance, at the pain and suffering of USDA employees and minority farmers. Despite requests made by Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa and The USDA Coalition of Minority Employees, the Senate Agriculture Committee has failed to hold full committee hearings.

"We will "Filibuster for Justice" daily and non-stop, in front of USDA, until this administration brings this plantation culture at USDA to an end," said Lawrence Lucas, President, of the USDA Coalition of Minority Employees.

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it".

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

This is not a political event....nor designed to target any political party or candidate

END

FW: JPMorgan Fighting 10,000 Lawsuits: FILE! FILE! FILE!

---

Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:29:30 -0800
From: cornmash008@yahoo.com
Subject: Fw: JPMorgan Fighting 10,000 Lawsuits: FILE! FILE! FILE!
To: terri4truth@gmail.com; rudithomas1011@yahoo.com; drterrylyn@yahoo.com; tonykeyhorses@yahoo.com; restore_it_now@yahoo.com; eddie_messer@yahoo.com; bornedaneagle@yahoo.com; abonnie@pacbell.net; Soldiersaint@sbcglobal.net; poolworld90@yahoo.com; henjowil@gmail.com; jimstrees@yahoo.com; angusfarms@hotmail.com; addinquir@aol.com; meredith2729@yahoo.com; mompookie@hotmail.com

--- On Tue, 3/1/11, Private Attorney General <justice0927@sbcglobal.net> wrote: From: Private Attorney General <justice0927@sbcglobal.net> Subject: JPMorgan Fighting 10,000 Lawsuits: FILE! FILE! FILE! To: "Private Attorney General" <justice0927@sbcglobal.net> Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2011, 7:54 PM NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- JPMorgan Chase (JPM_) is a defendant in more than 10,000 legal proceedings and may be $4.5 billion short of reserves needed to cover those costs in a worst-case scenario, the firm said in a regulatory filing on Monday.   The New York-based bank's legal woes range from individual actions against JPMorgan Chase to class actions with "potentially millions" of litigants to "regulatory/government investigations." The suits include common law tort and contract claims, statutory antitrust claims, securities claims and consumer protection claims, the bank said in its 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. JPMorgan is the last of the four big U.S. banks to detail some of its exposure to litigation in its annual report. While the banks didn't say what their overall litigation reserves are, JPMorgan, Citigroup (C_), Bank of America (BAC_) and Wells Fargo (WFC_) outlined a potential $11.2 billion shortfall in litigation reserves altogether. Last week, Citi said it might fall $4 billion short, while BofA said it might be $1.5 billion behind legal cost reserves and Wells Fargo said it might be $1.2 billion behind. Banks' legal woes have gotten much attention ever since the so-called "robosigning" scandal erupted last fall. Banks made a practice of letting employees sign off on thousands of foreclosure affidavits without properly vetting the underlying information. In some cases, homes were seized and in others there is doubt over who rightly owns the property - both in terms of mortgage-bond investors and in terms of occupants. Regulators and all 50 state attorneys general have been investigating big banks' mortgage practices. Federal agencies are trying to pull together a plan to settle with big mortgage servicers in a deal that may result in billions of dollars' worth of principal forgiveness for troubled borrowers. The result of private litigation is more difficult to predict. In a conference call last month, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon predicted that securitization lawsuits alone will be a long, difficult battle. "It is going to be years before this plays out and this litigation is going to be fought almost securitization by securitization," Dimon said. "There is almost no other way to do it." http://www.thestreet.com/story/11026295/1/jpmorgan-fighting-10000-lawsuits.html CW Private Attorney General http://privateattorneygeneral.spruz.com

FW: Letter to editor: or guest column "Open Letter to Congress"

---

Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:00:46 -0800
From: davis4000_2000@yahoo.com
Subject: Letter to editor: or guest column "Open Letter to Congress"
To: muckracker1@gmail.com

 

Open letter to Congress--It's time for weed cleaning in USDA
By Monica Davis
In response to US Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack's 2009 letter claiming
that it was a "new era at USDA", and before he shoved his boot in his mouth with
the premature firing of Shirley Sherrord over a highly edited clip showing her
"racist ways," Lesa Donnelly, a former USDA Forest Service fire fighter who is
now an activist/mediator, wrote:
I am experiencing déjà vu from your 14 action items. While they sound like a
good start, excuse me if I am somewhat skeptical of your plan to bring in a new
era of civil rights at USDA - I've heard it before. And while past "new
approaches" took years to implement, employees continued to lose their
financial, emotional and physical well-being from harassment and retaliation.
The number one reason for this is that many of the employees you will task to
implement your action items are the same employees who worked under Espy,
Glickman, and so on. They were obstacles to positive change in civil rights then
and they will be obstacles to change now. I would like to take this opportunity
to recommend that you pay close attention to the current employees in your OGC
and inspector general offices, civil rights office, human resources office,
mediation cadre, and your directors and regional foresters because these
employees have been the biggest obstacle to making positive changes in civil
rights. I would like to suggest that you seriously reconsider contracting with
attorneys to represent the agency. I've observed they have little vested
interest in settling EEO cases and much interest in receiving thousands of
taxpayer dollars as they extend cases to oblivion. Action item one should be -
Weed Out Obstructionists.
Donnelly, a current Vice-President of the Coalition of Minority Employees, noted
massive problems with USDA and the Forest Service (FS), where substantial
bigotry remains in the "Last Plantation" after more than three decades of
litigation and congressional hearings and legislation.
·         In 2007, a woman in Region 4 was brutally assaulted by a male
coworker. The coworker was not held properly accountable. The woman believes she
is at risk for additional violence. FS management has been nonresponsive and she
has been retaliated against in 2008 and 2009 for filing a complaint.

·         In 2008, an African American woman in Region 5 was threatened and
intimidated by her white male supervisor who told another man that he wanted to
shoot her with his gun. There was no accountability and the woman, who had been
complaining about harassment from this man for years was retaliated against for
reporting the incident.
·         In 2009, there are continual Region 5 incidents of female employees
and employees of color being discriminated against in hiring, promotion and
assignments. This is occurring despite 30 years of litigation for gender and
race discrimination.
·         Women in law enforcement and firefighting are harassed and
discriminated against throughout the Forest Service, particularly in Regions 4,
5 and 6.
·         In 2008, a Region 6 female firefighter (Helicopter Rappel Manager) was
terminated as a result of whistle blowing on her crew for drinking on the job
and other unsafe practices. Former Under Secretary Mark Rey personally assured
me an OIG investigation was initiated but key witnesses have yet to be
interviewed. As we move into fire season I am concerned that personnel and the
public are still at risk.
·         A former female employee in Region 10 (Alaska) who has a serious
disability and physical deformity was harassed, isolated and shunned by her male
supervisor and coworkers. They would make fun of her, humiliate her and treat
her as if she was mentally incompetent due to her physical disability. She quit
due to emotional stress.
·         Recently two African American employees in APHIS were publicly
humiliated when they were presented with monkey dolls as awards.  (Donnelly
letter)


Donnelly is right: USDA is in need of a major weed cleaning. If Congress does
not clean out the obstructionist weeds in the agency, they will strangle and
impede this Settlement, just like they strangled the last one, and other civil
rights class actions over the last 15 years.


It will be business as usual. USDA has made sure of that, beginning with its
failure to make it its mission to add a statement of future compliance and
efforts to ensure compliance with civil rights laws and federal statutes:

Judge Friedman also declared that he was "surprised and disappoint[ed]" that the
USDA did not want to include in the consent decree a sentence that in the future
the USDA would exert "best efforts to ensure compliance with all applicable
statutes and regulations prohibiting discrimination."(CRS report for Congress,
The Pigford Case: USDA Settlement of a Discrimination Suit by Black Farmers,
2010)

In fact, it has been business as usual for the past 14 years, from the filing of
the Donnely female firefighter class action in 1995 against the US Forest
Service (USDA), to the first Black Farmer Lawsuit in 1997, to  the current 2008
Pigford II case.

Lawrence Lucas, Coalition President said, "The blatant discrimination in USDA
and especially the Forest Service is allowing wide-spread abuse of women and
others in California.  We thought the Donnelly Settlement would have a positive
impact but the Forest Service refuses to implement it and USDA refuses to hold
managers accountable.

The 14 year of litigation--Pigford and the current Black Farmer Agreement shows
that it will take more than mere funding of a settlement to eliminate the
institutional bigotry and criminal collusion which necessitated the Black Farmer
Settlement, and other class action suits for women farmers, Native American
Farmers and disadvantaged white farmers in the first place.


Litigation against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for discrimination
against African- American farmers began in August 1997 with two discrimination
suits brought by black farmers—Pigford v. Glickman, No. 97-1978 (D.D.C. 1997)
and Brewington v. Glickman, No. 98-1693 (D.D.C. 1997)—but its origins go back
much further.1 For many years, black farmers had complained that they were not
receiving fair treatment when they applied to local county committees (which
make the decisions) for farm loans or assistance. These farmers alleged that
they were being denied USDA farm loans or forced to wait longer for loan
approval than were non-minority farmers. Many black farmers contended that they
were facing foreclosureand financial ruin because the USDA denied them timely
loans and debt restructuring. Moreover, many claimed that the USDA was not
responsive to discrimination complaints. A huge agency backlog of unresolved
complaints began to build after the USDA's Civil Rights Office was closed in
1983. (CRS report for Congress, The Pigford Case: USDA Settlement of a
Discrimination Suit by Black Farmers, 2010)

Moreover, researchers note that the latest Black Farmer Settlement, "Pigford II"
is "terminal" in the sense that it can not be appealed:

The Pigford II settlement is final and may not be appealed. A provision of the
settlement permitted the claimants to void the settlement should Congress not
make the $1.15 billion appropriation by March 31, 2010. While Congress did not
make this deadline, the settlement is clearly a priority of both the USDA and
the White House, suggesting that the plaintiffs are unlikely to exercise the
right to void the settlement in the near term. Unlike the original Pigford
decision, the Pigford II settlement does not include a suggested settlement
amount for individual claimants, although it does provide for higher payments to
claimants who go through a more rigorous review process. Claimants can seek
fast-track payments of up to $50,000 plus debt relief, or choose a longer
process for damages of up to $250,000. Payments to successful claimants could
begin in the middle of 2011 if the funds are appropriated. (CRS report for
Congress, The Pigford Case: USDA Settlement of a Discrimination Suit by Black
Farmers, 2010)
The "late filers" who missed out on Pigford I have the opportunity to fast-track
their claims and receive up to $50,000 and debt relief, or they can choose a
more rigorous process which is longer, and could result in damages of up to
$250,000.  Either way, it is a bittersweet pill for farmers who have lost farm,
property and income worth millions.
When the average tractor costs more than $50,000 and land goes for as much as
$2500/acre, or more, many of these farmers have lost years of income, and
property worth as much as $500,000, or more.  The  black farmer whose land
contains more than $100,000,000 in coal and oil reserves, the cotton farmer who
produced more than $250,000 in cotton annually, or the would be chicken farmer
who was driven out of business, looks with bitterness at the $250,000 ceiling,
but half a loaf is better than none.
While half a loaf is better than none, many of these farmers would like to see
these institutional thieves, abusers and rapists jailed and prosecuted.  That
will only happen if Congress grows a spine and cleans the weeds out of USDA.
Civil rights laws, federal law and the Constitution apply to USDA, and
everywhere else.

Many farmers are saying thanks, but they'd like to see some house cleaning

at USDA.
Monica Davis is an author/editor/activist who has written and reported for
print, Internet and radio outlets for  more than a decade.  Her book, Land,
Legacy, and Lynching: Building the Future for Black America profiles the
atrocity of economic terrorism in the nation's cities and in farm country.

They knew all along, 1907 USGS

the United Sates Geological Survey 1907, the property in Scott county Indiana has a very large amount of oil. natural gas,shale(s), and other valuable minerals.

The farm of Mayme Seaver un-remarried widow of Oren D.Seaver,s/o Charles and Nola (Morgan)Seaver, and Mayme & Oren Seaver's adult son and his family,this land has the center point of four corner sections right in the middle.

A Fraud perpetrated by the USDA and the DNR against this family and their land, so the government could gain control of the valuable assets beneath the surface, to do this they had to steal the land by defrauding the entire family[except the sister that worked for the USDA, because she helped her boss to perpetrate the Fraud]

At this exact time, 10:06am February 15, 2007 exactly four years ago today the Defrauding of the Seaver Family took on other aspects, such as unlawful holding a
body against their will,kidnapping, unlawful Trespass,violence used against a minor child,Unlawful entry with no court order, search or arrest warrants,unlawful search and seizure of private and personal property, destruction of property,theft,and many other atrocities.

Charles Seaver, bought his farm in 1914, and paid with gold backed cash earned by contracting tomatoes to Morgan's Packing Company, in Austin, Indiana, it was bought paid for and improved before he married Miss Nola Morgan, their their only child a son Oren was born in 1921. This property was theirs before taxation occured, in Scott County.

Prior to 1956 Oren and his wife Mayme purchased the rest of the land and moved out closed to their parents as Mayme's family owned a dairy on the next road east.[which was also lost to USDA]

In July 1985, Jerry and Melissa Seaver were married, and in Dec. 1985, his sister told him their mother wanted out of the farm and he should come to FmHA to buy her out. Now we find that FmHA[CSMike Brown]had made a phone call concerning Jerry Seaver(who wasn't an borrower nor had been their to pick up and application, nearly a year before his sister came up with the suggestion)to [PCA-Dave Morris].asking questions about Jerry and his operating loan, he did not own property at this time
and then we found out after all these years, that the sister had told Mayme that Jerry was wanting to buy her out and had no prior knowledge of the conversation with the sister and Jerry stating that mom wanted Jerry to Buy her out.

Senator Grassley,
My name is Melissa Seaver and I am a Whisleblower asking for your help in retrieving our farm back as it was stolen by defrauding , so therefore it still belongs to the Seaver Family Nunc Pro Tunc , Instanter.
Melissa Ann;family[Seaver]
(812)752-6611