order non hybrid seeds LandRightsNFarming: Re: POST FW; DEMOCRACY vs REPUBLIC

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Re: POST FW; DEMOCRACY vs REPUBLIC



On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:30 AM, <itconstitutional@aol.com> wrote:


DEMOCRACY vs REPUBLIC
 
 The Soldiers Training Manual, issued November 30, 1928 gives the following
definitions:
 

"TM 2000-25: 118-120, Democracy - A government of the masses. Authority is
derived through mass meeting or any other form of direct expression. Results
in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic, negating property
rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the people shall regulate,
whether it be based upon deliberation, or governed by passion, prejudice,
and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in
demagogism (sic), license, agitation, discontent, and anarchy."
 

"TM2000-25: 120-121, Republic - Authority is derived through election by
the people of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude
toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible
economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in
accord with fixed principles, and established evidence, with a strict regard
to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be
brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny
or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice,
contentment, and progress.
 
READ THE DEMOCRACY AGAIN
 
 THIS IS WHY THE COUNTY ASSMEBLY OR  GRAND JURIES , COMMON LAW COURTS ARE BEING DENY BY THE SYSTEM  AND GETTING CHARGED. THIS IS WHY  THE SYSTEM WILL NOT ALLOW THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH CAROLINA OR TEXAS OR ANY OTHER STATE  OR GROUP OF PEOPLE TO FORM THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT .  THAT WHY IF ANY OTHER PARTY COMES INTO THE PICTURE SUCH AS THE TEA PARTY THEY CATCH HELL . THIS IS HOW THEY DID IT . THIS IS HOW THEY TOOK OVER .
 
 
ROD