Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:55:11 -0700
From: davidleebuess@yahoo.com
Subject: Case Law Not Found In IRS Code Section 26 Fraud By Trickery.
To: yahseph@gmail.com; ewi261@aol.com; mrsmith@co.hancock.oh.us; cleveland.cv@ic.fbi.gov; OIG@uscp.gov; Lbuess@comcast.net; g_a_buess@hughes.net; hp123por@bellsouth.net; aarpnewsletters@aarp.org; info@agday.com; angusfarms@hotmail.com; kedan5863@yahoo.com; four.arms@wildblue.net
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS: LOWER COURTS: NOT FOUND IN INTERNAL REVENUE CODE: TITLE 26: FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT: 18 USC 1341 Honest Service Fraud. Legal Maximum: "It Is A Fraud To Conceal A Fraud."
This Document Is For Education Of The General Public Only As Private Attorney Generals Must When Filing A Case Must Benefit The General Population. Print And Keep It Handy. If You Are Not Fully Educated On The 1933 Bankruptcy Act: Administrative Procedures Act: Trading With The Enemy Act: Gold Standards Act: Bank Holiday And The Congressional Records Get Busy As These Will Prove Beyond Any Doubt Acts Of TREASON And Sedition Have Been Committed: Collusion:Civil RICO:Fraud:Intentional Fraud:RICO: Tax Fraud:Violation Of Oath And Bond:Fraudulent Convayances:Theft:Grand Theft:Slavery:Identity Theft: Al Et All. File A 1040X And Get Your Money Back. When Cashing All Checks Endorse It As Such: Redeem In Lawful Money Pursuant To 48 Stat 337: Title 12 USC 411. Follow This Case: :sirdavid-lee:dba[BUESS,DAVID BUESS] And Rodney- Dale; Class Private Attorney General U.S Court Of Appeals Federal Circuit Case No 2011-1318.
The INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is a DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY – UNITED NATIONS And Their Personnel Are Trained By The Personnel Department Of The UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION. The IRS Are A Collections Agency And Fall Under Title 5 Of The United States Code: They Have No Lawful Right To Use The IRS Code Against Anyone. In 1999 All Revenue Districts And Directors Were Abolished Including Washington, D.C.. Public Company Traded On D&B For Profit. I Demand The Law License Of All IRS Agents: Judges: Lawyers: Attorneys:All Practicing Law Without A License. A BAR Card Is Not A Law License.
1818 U. S. v Beavans U. S. 336 And (1945) Hooven & Allison v Evatt 65 S Ct. 870, 880, 321 U.S. 652 89 L Ed 12.52 Established Two Political Jurisdictions For The U. S. Congress: 1) U. S. Citizens Are Residence Of One Of The Holding Territories Belonging To The United States: Guam: Puerto Rico: Virgin Islands: Washington, D.C.: Al Et Al: 2) The union States (50). Congress Writes Legislation: Corporate Policy: For Both But Fail To Distinguish For Which Political Jurisdiction The Legislation: Corporate Policy The Legislation Is Being Written For: Fraud By Trickery: Honest Service Fraud Thus The union States (50) Are Accepting It Without Question As Most Legislators Do Not Even Know About U. S. v Beavans. So You Are A Man:Woman On The Land In The union State Of[FILL IN THE ALL CAPS NAME OF YOUR STATE:IE:CORPORATION.
TREASON: UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28, 3002(15)(A)(B)(C)Definitions: United States Of America A.K.A. United States: De Facto See 1933 Bankruptcy Act And Executive Order 6102 Of President Roosevelt:Suspends The Constitution: – The Gold Standards Act-Criminal Fraud To Steal The Treasury Of The United States: Violation Of Oath And Bond: Induced Panic By Threat Of A $10,000.00 Fine. Hoard – Look Up The Meaning.
§3002 Definitions:
(15) "United States" Means-
(A) A Federal Corporation
(B) An Agency: Department, Commission, Board, Or Other Entity Of
The United States: Or
(C) An Instrumentality Of The United States.
1. Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.Co., 240 U. S. 1.11 (1916)
2. Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U.S. 581, 20 S.Ct. 448 (1900)
3. Texas v. White, 7 Wall. 700; U.S. v. Cathcart, 25 F.Case No. 14,756
4. Stanton v. Baltic Minning Company 240 U.S. 103, 112 (1919)
5. Bowers v Kerbaugh-Empire 271 U.S. 170, 174,174 (1926); In re Charge to Grand Jury, 30 F. Case No. 18,273 (65 C.J. Section 2) -- not known to be overturned.
6. Peck v Lowe 247 U.S.165, 173 (1918)
7. Doyle v Mitchell Bros. 247 U. S. 179,183 (1918)
8. Eisner v Macomber 252 U. S. 179, 183 (1918)
9. Evans v Gore 253 U.S. 245(1920)
10. Flint v Stone Tracy Co. 220 U.S. 107, 144,151-152, 165, 55 S L.ed. 107 419 Sup CCL Rep 342, Ann Cas. 1912 B 1312 (1911)
11. Merchants Loan And Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U.S. 509 519 (1921)
12. Helvering v Edison Brothers' Stone, 8th Cir. 133 F2d 575 (1943)
13. Southern Pacific v Lowe 247 U.S. 330, 335 (1918): Art 1, Sec. 8, Cl 17 And Art.IV, Sec. 3 CL 2: Art. 1 Sec. 8 Cl. 17: Art. IV Sec. 3 Cl. 15 USC 1681h: 28 U.S.C. 1333 or 1337: False Claims Act, see 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(7)
14. UNITED STATES v MERKSKY 361 U.S. 431, 438(1960)
15. CALIFORNIA BANKERS ASSN. v SCHULZ 419 U.S.21, 26 (1974)
16. FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORP v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, 384 (1947)
17. Utah Power & Light Co v. United States, 391
18. United States v. Stewart, 108 re Floyd Acceptance, 7: Wall 666; Article 1 Sec.2: Art. 1 Sec.9
19. Knowlton v Moore, 178 U.S. 41, 47(1900); 19 CFR 351, 102
20. Butcher's Union Co. v Cresent City Co. 111 U.S. 746, 756 (1884)
21. TRUAX v CORRIGAN 257 U.S. 312,348 (1921)
22. Sims v Abrens 167 Ark. 557 271 S.W. 720, 773 (1925)
23. Myer v STATE OF NEBRASKA 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923)
24. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall 36
25. Butchers' Union Co. v Crescent City Co. 4 Sup Ct. 652
26. Vick Wo v Hopkins 6 Sup Ct. 1064
27. Minnesota v Barer 10 Sup Ct 862
28. Allegeyer v Lousiana 17 Sup Ct. 427
29. Lochner v New York 25 Sup Ct. 539, 3 Ann Cas 1133
30. Twining v New Jersey 29 Sup Ct. 14
31. Chicago B&O R.R. v. McGuire 31 Sup Ct. 259
32. Truax v Raich 36 Sup Ct. 7, L.R.A.1916D, 545 Ann. Cas. 1917B 283.
33. Adams v Tanner 37 Sup Ct. 662 L.R.A.1917F, 1163, Ann. Cas. 1917D 973
34. New York Life Ins. Co v Dodge 38 Sup Ct. 337, Ann Cas. 1918E, 593
35. Traux v Corrigan 42 Sup Ct. 124
36. Adkins v Children's Hospital 43 Sup Ct. 394, 67 L. Ed (April 9, 1923)
37. Wyeth v Cambridge Board Of Health 200 Mass 474, 86 N. E. 925, 128 Am St. Rep. 439 23 L. R. A. (N.S.) 147
38. MURDOCK v COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 319 U.S. 105, 113; 63 Sup Ct. 875; 87 L Ed 1298 (1943);
39. Tyler et al Administrators v. United States, 281 US 497, 502 (1930
40. Pollock v Farmers' Loan And Trust Co. 157 U.S. 429, 442, 555, 556, 573, 582, 595 (1895)
41. STRATTON'S INDEPENDENCE, LTD. V HOWBERT 231 U.S. 399, 417 (1913)
42. Main v Grand Trunk R. Co. 35 L. ed 994, 3 Inters. Com.Rep. 807, 12 Sup Ct. Rep. , As interpreted in Galveston, H&S A.R. Co. v. Texas, 52 S.L. ed. 1031, 1037, 28 Sup Ct. Rep. 638
43. U. S. v WHITRIDGE 231 U. S. 231 U. s. 144, 147(1913)
44. Taft v BOWERS 278 U.S. 470, 481 (1929)
45. COPPAGE v STATE OF KANSAS 236 U.S.1, 23-24(1915)
46. U. S. v. Constantine 296 U.S. 287(1935?) IRS Ruled Unconstitutional As Prohibition Had Been Repealed. In 1965 The United States Supreme Court Traced The IRS Back To The Civil War And Found No Legislative Act Of Congress Lawfully Establishing The IRS As A Government Agency: Contractor: Sub-Contractor. Paul Andrews Mitchell (Federal Witness) Web Site supremelaw.org then Click On 31 Questions. Today The General Accounting Office In Affidavit Refuse To Produce The Lawful OMB Number For The IRS. None Of Their Publications Carry A OMB Number:Meaning they Are Not A U. S. Government Agency: Department: Contractor: Sub-Congractor. Today In Affidavit Congress Refuses To Produce The Organic Act Of Congress making The IRS A Government Agency:Department: Congractor:Sub-Contractor: Contact: :sirdavid-lee:dba[BUESS,DAVID BUESS] Office of Corrections For The Great Turtle Island 419 694 5796 Or Write Us C/O 22014 Delaware Township Road 184 Arlington Ohio [45814-9998] The Number For The Emperial Office In Canada Is 1 204 282 0719.
47. The IRS Cannot Tax From The Source (Fraud By Trickery) Only From The Source Of The Kind In Question: Commissioner v Glenshaw Glass Co. 348 U.S. 426 (1945) Deals With Corporate Profit Gained From Settlement In Anti-Trust Case Not Income.
Recent Case Rulings Against U. S. AND IRS
1 No Law Requires Payment Of An Income Tax: Federal District Court Western Division Of Tennessee (Memphis) Case No. 03-CR-20111 U. S. v. Kluglin (6/22-23/2005)
2. U. S. v. Linda Wall U. S. District Court, Central District Of California, Western Div. (Los Angeles) Case No. 2:04 cv 05325DDP-MAN and 2:03 cv 08406DDP-MAN Dismissed Without Prejudice: IRS Found Guilty Of Stepping Outside Their Authority: Mail Fraud: Counterfeiting Documents: No Enforcement Section Of IRS Code etc.
3. U. S. v Lawrence USDC Peoria IL 06 cr 10019 (2005) IRS violated Paper Work Reductions Act: 44 U.S.C.3500-3520: 3512 I.R.S. Failed To Inform Lawrence He Was NOT required To Fill Out The Forms.
4. U.S. v Lindsey Springer: 08-278, 09 cr 043: Without Revenue Districts There Is No Delegation Of Authority: Revenue Officers or Revenue Agents Are Not The Secretary Of The Treasury Nor The Commissioner Of The INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.
We Will Make Adjustments As Required To Help Benefit The General Population. I Have Already Advised Congress {CONGRESS] The IRS Code Is Void For Reason Of Fraud. This May Also Effect Probate Laws.
l
