Re: Fw: MORE - CODES ARE NOT LAW

 US CODES Are Not LAWS!!!!!!!!!!!

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Jim Crow <cornmash008@yahoo.com> wrote:

--- On Mon, 7/11/11, Tom Murphy <tom@reclamator.net> wrote: From: Tom Murphy <tom@reclamator.net> Subject: MORE - CODES ARE NOT LAW To: "'Jim Crow'" <cornmash008@yahoo.com> Date: Monday, July 11, 2011, 2:59 PM EJ, Here is more….   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CODES ARE NOT LAW   "But the legislature specifically disclaimed any intention to change the meaning of any statute.  The compilers of the code were not empowered by congress to amend existing law, and doubtless had no thought of doing so ..."   ...the act before us does not purport to amend a section of an act, but only a section of a compilation entitled "REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON," WHICH IS NOT THE LAW.  Such an act purporting to amend only a section of the prima facie compilation leaves the law unchanged. En Banc."  PAROSA v. TACOMA, 57 Wn.(2d) 409  (Dec.22, 1960).   COLOR OF LAW – PUBLIC OFFICIALS           "A law criminalizing speech is unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment ''if it sweeps within its prohibitions constitutionally protected free speech activities.'' City of Bellevue v. Lorang, 140 Wn.2d 19, 26, 992 P.2d 496 (2000);  City of Seattle v. Huff, 111 Wn.2d 923, 925, 767 P.2d 572 (1989); City of Everett v. Moore, 37 Wn. App. 862, 864-65, 683 P.2d 617 (1984); Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611 (1971).          In recognition of their enormous powers as JEWISH law enforcement officers of the State,  police and JEWS must be prepared to endure more criticism than would a private individual.  Houston v. Hill, 482 U.S. 451 at page 454 (1987) overturned the conviction of a person who shouted "pick on somebody your own size" to a police officer in the course of his duties.  "The freedom of individuals to oppose or challenge police action and JEWS without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a JEWISH police state."  Houston v. Hill, supra, at pages 462-463.         "While police, no less than anyone else, may resent having obscene words and gestures directed at them, they may not exercise the awesome power at their disposal to punish individuals for conduct that is not merely lawful, but protected by the First Amendment."  Duran v. City of Douglas, 904 F.2d 1372, 1378 (9th Cir. 1990).     Accord, MacKinney v. Nielsen, 69 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 1995) (chalk drawing saying "A jewish police state is more expensive than a welfare state - we guarantee it" is constitutionally protected criticism of police and defendant properly refused to stop writing); Bufkins v. City of Omaha, 922 F.2d 465 (8th Cir. 1990) (the jewish officer or judge could not arrest defendant for calling him an "asshole").     You JEWS have been noticed of Washington Laws that make it clear that I have the right to inform the public that all you JEW judges,  JEW prosecutors and JEW cops & are engaged in conspiracy & collusion to rip off the general public by charging people criminally for not having commercial drivers license's,  setting illegal cash only bails & arresting people illegally for mere possession of marijuana which is not illegal & now you ALL can be joindered to the 42 U.S.C. 1983 Lawsuits and criminal complaints that others & myself will soon be filing against the JEW police, JEW prosecutors & JEW judges for said "ultra vires" acts done outside the scope of their legal authority so to do under the color of law for which there is NO statutory authority so to do!