order non hybrid seeds LandRightsNFarming: Re: Fw: Neither a King nor a Congress can write legislation to control that which they did not create.

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Re: Fw: Neither a King nor a Congress can write legislation to control that which they did not create.



On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jim Crow <cornmash008@yahoo.com> wrote:


--- On Wed, 4/27/11, 0000 00000 <torgnoperson@gmail.com> wrote:

From: 0000 00000 <torgnoperson@gmail.com>
Subject: Neither a King nor a Congress can write legislation to control that which they did not create.
To:
Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 3:31 AM

COURT CASES   CRUDEN v. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70.     

              From page 11  of   How Citizens are transformed into Persons

       Also, see 'The creation of a civil or legal person out of a thing,

                                                                                United States v. Amy, 24 Fed.Cas.792, 794 #14,445 (1859)

                                                                        Introduction to Corporate Political Societies  pg 10

So the problem at hand is that every statute is written with the term "person" in mind. Why, you ask? Well as I quoted in my book "The New History of America," the case of Cruden v Nealewhere the court states a principle of natural law so clear that it cannot be twisted by any lawyer, that man is only bound by the laws of nature. Here is what the court stated;

" When a change of government takes place, from a monarchial to a republican government, the old form is dissolved. Those who lived under it, and did not choose to become members of the new, had a right to refuse their allegiance to it, and to retire elsewhere. By being a part of the society subject to the old government, they had not entered into any engagement to become subject to any new form the majority might think proper to adopt. That the majority shall prevail is a rule posterior to the formation of government, and results from it. It is not a rule binding upon mankind in their natural state. There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent." CRUDEN v. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70.

 

 

'The creation of a civil or legal person out of a thing, the investure of a chattel with toga civillis, may be an achievement of the imperial power, but it is beyond the compass of an American congress. Congress must first emancipate the slave, before it can endow him with the rights of a citizen under the constitution, or impose upon him the responsibilities of a legal person, or compel him to pay money, or part with liberty.

                                                                                United States v. Amy, 24 Fed.Cas.792, 794 #14,445 (1859)

                                                                        Introduction to Corporate Political Societies  pg 10

 

 

      The 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, ratified in 1868, creates or at least for the first time, a citizenship of the United States, as distinct from that of the states. . . [i.e.  a citizen distinct from  a union state republic Citizen, i.e. a state Citizen]

                                                                        Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.  Page 657

 

Neither a King nor a Congress can write legislation to control that which they did not create.

 

torgnoperson@gmail.com