Fwd: California Judge Peter Meeka Refuses To Disclose Bank of America Ties

Subject:	California Judge Peter Meeka Refuses To Disclose Bank of America Ties
Date:	Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:33:13 -0400

This is very interesting...seen on RMN...please forward to Jeff Brown...

California Judge Peter Meeka Refuses to Disclose Financial Benefits to Him by Bank of America, Accord Due Process

Posted By: CGI_admin
Date: Saturday, 16-Apr-2011 20:14:17
From CGI's CatScratches:

California Judge Peter Meeka Refuses to Disclose Financial Benefits to Him by Bank of America, Accord Due Process

Bribing of state and US judges by Bank of America must be a serious concern.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/52846502/11-04-12-PRESS-RELEASE-Bribing-of-State-and-US-Judges-by-Bank-of-America-Must-be-a-Serious-Concern

Los Angeles, April 12, 2011 - In Lomas v Bank of America(KC059379) Plaintiff Susan Lomas is trying to protect her rights through a Quiet Title action against alleged fraud by Bank of America and others in foreclosure procedures.The case is opined as Fraud on the Court through collusion of BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, California Judge PETER MEEKA, Clerk of the Court JOHN A CLARKE, and Attorney MARK ASDOURIAN, aimed to dispossess Lomas, while denying her due process and access to an honest court.

In the latest episode in this case, Lomas appeared in court on Friday, April 8, 2011, with requests for:
· Due process notice and service of minutes and access to court records.
· A statement on the record by Judge Meeka regarding financial benefits to him, if any, by Bank of America.

In response, Lomas was subjected to what is opined as another instance of Fraud on the Court: Lomas was told that her requests were denied, but no minutes at all were produced for the proceeding (see copy of the minutes below). The records, which Lomas received from the Office of the Clerk as "minutes" showed a date of "00/00/00", with no evidence of a hearing by any Judge of the Court and no evidence of any hearing or ruling at all.

Bribing of state and US judges by Bank of America must be a serious concern. Under similar circumstances, the following judges responded in the same manner:
· US Judge Virginia Phillips;
· US Magistrate Carla Woehrle, and
· California Judge Terry Friedman.

A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case of Lomas v Bank of America all along:[ii]

· None of the minutes were certified by the Deputy Clerk of the Court;
· None of the minutes were noticed and served by the Court;
· Multiple proceedings were secretly listed in the minutes as "off of the record";
· No Initial Case Management Conference was ever held;
· Plaintiff has been repeatedly denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket), where the true registration of the proceedings (or lack thereof) would be discerned;
· An invalid online "Case Summary" is published by the Court, which would lead a naive reader to conclude that valid and effectual proceedings have been held and rulings have been entered by the court.

· Attorney Mark Asdourian appears in the case for BofA, while refusing to provide certificate of Attorney of Record. Attorney Asdourianhas filed false and deliberately misleading banking records as "Request for Judicial Notice", which was granted by Judge Peter Meeka.
· No declaration or any other record signed by Bank of America authorized person was ever filed in the case.

Conduct of Bank of America in this case is inconsistent with the Bank of America Code of Ethics and Outside Counsel Procedures, which prohibit appearances by unauthorized attorneys and obstructionist conduct in litigation. [iii]

The conduct of Judge Meeka and Clerk John A Clarke must also be deemed as violations of the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of Plaintiff Susan Lomas.
 
Minutes of the April 8, 2011 Ex Parte Proceedings, as received by Plaintiff Susan Lomas from the Office of the Clerk.
____
LINKS:
[1] 11-04-08 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379): Ex Parte Applications for Due Process and for a Statement by California Judge Peter J Meeka Regarding Financial Benefits to Him by Bank of America
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52844251/
[ii] 11-03-20 PRESS RELEASE Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Bank of America Continues Racketeering in the Los Angeles Superior Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51160102/
11-03-20 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles online "Case Summary" and Minutes
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51157264/
11-04-05 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Fraud on the Court in a Quiet Title Action
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52336989/
11-04-06 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) "Request[s] for Judicial Notice"- Additional Evidence of Fraud on the Court in Foreclosure Procedure s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52420585/
11-04-07 Press Release: Lomas v BofA (KC059379) Judge Meeka is Requested to Restore Due Process, Declare Any Benefits from BofA
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52494342/
11-03-31 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Request and Response for Certification of Authority as Attorney of Record s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52516705/
[iii] 09-01-27 Bank of America Code of Ethics s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32173783/
08-12-11 Bank of America - Outside Counsel Procedures
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27932516/
_____________

--

FOOD = SURVIVAL !  15 Year Storage !
Get 6 FREE Gourmet Meals - Just pay shipping !
FOOD Even When Supermarkets DON'T Have It !
FOOD For YOUR Family When You NEED It !
http://bgxfuturefoods.myefoods.com/freemeals/